I recently got an email from Steve Cameron with the sketch shown below that he had drawn of a concept for filling and forming earthbag tubing into a uniform rectangular form on the wall being built.

formingmachine3.jpg

Steve asked for any comments that I might have about this idea, so I wrote:

This is certainly an interesting idea, and a great drawing! I think that I understand your concept pretty well from the sketch. The squared bag shape would only retain that shape if the contents were solidified, as would happen with a soil/cement mix (which you specify); looser material would eventually force the bags into their more natural oval shape after the form were removed.
But then, I wonder, why bother with using the bag material at all? What you describe is pretty classic rammed earth with lifted forms, and there would be better adhesion with rammed earth directly upon rammed earth rather than with the bag material intervening.
If the purpose for forming the earthbags this way is mainly to reduce the work and material in plastering, I have to say that I don’t find the standard approach objectionable. All those crevasses between the bags give the plaster much better “tooth” than a smooth wall would, so there is an advantage to leaving these voids.
I should add, though, that the apparatus and concept is very clever, and shows great inventiveness; I suspect that it would actually function quite well as drawn.
I might mention that rammed earth is often formed with slip forms done in lifts of maybe 2 feet. The proper soil mix is 15-30% clay and the rest sand. Sometime a small amount (maybe 5%) of Portland cement is added as a stabilizer, but not always. This is one area where earthbags have an advantage, because you can get away with a larger variety of soil mixes.
Your suggested mix of 30% cement to 70% soil would be equivalent to a 3:7 mix of cement/sand concrete, which is very rich in cement! Standard soil cement mixes call for between 6 and 16% cement, depending on the specifics of the soil and the intended use.
Then Steve wrote back that the device was actually inspired by a photo he had seen on a site featuring the Natural Building Colloquium in Texas in 2007, which he redesigned to suit his own needs.

formingmachine2.jpg

Comments

Earthbag Tube Forming Machine — 5 Comments

    • Link doesn’t work for me. Machines like this don’t work for earthbag building because it’s best to fill bags on the wall. Plus, you want to use sandy/clay soil not sand.

  1. Take away the wooden frame and the outside roller wheel. Design to removeable extensions. 1) set of wheels so you can push this thing on the ground level. 2) Something to help with stability of the device as you get two higher levels. Something like that could speed up the laying of those continuous bags considerable.

    • Actually many hundreds or possibly a few thousand earthbag tube structures have been satisfactorily built without any such machines. They’re really not needed. Simplicity is preferred whenever possible. If anything, the simple device shown in the photo would be a good choice.

  2. Kaki Hunter and Donald Kiffmeyer from OKOKOK Productions used a device that Kaki had constructed that looks exactly like your picture to a 2007 workshop in Colorado. It worked wonderfully.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.